Writing the nation and reframing early modern intellectual history in Hungary

Balázs Trencsényi*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract (may include machine translation)

    The article traces the development of Hungarian intellectual history of the early modern period from the emergence of the national romantic constructions of literary history to the recent turn towards contextualist and conceptual history. One of its main findings is the ideological importance of this period for the formation of the national canon, as it became a central point of reference for the emerging local methodological tradition of intellectual history, even if it was often compartamentalized under other categories. From this perspective, the article puts particular emphasis on ideological constructions seeking to define the nation and depict the emergence of modern national identity. This finding also offers a vantage point for analyzing the interplay between literary history and the socio-culturally focused approaches, which can be considered the main framework for the developments of the last two decades, when these local historiographical traditions entered into an interesting dialogue with the Western European and American schools of intellectual history. Along these lines, while pointing out the discursive continuities with the previous paradigms, which are shaping even the contemporary historiographical production, the article also ponders the ways in which the inherited (post-)romantic constructions can be successfully challenged.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)135-154
    Number of pages20
    JournalStudies in East European Thought
    Volume62
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2010

    Keywords

    • Contextualism
    • Early modern period
    • Geistesgeschichte
    • Hungary
    • Intellectual history
    • Marxism
    • National romanticism
    • Positivism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Writing the nation and reframing early modern intellectual history in Hungary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this