Why Trade Over-the-Counter? When Investors Want Price Discrimination

Tomy Lee, Chaojun Wang

    Research output: Working paper/PreprintPreprint

    Abstract (may include machine translation)

    Despite the availability of low-cost exchanges, over-the-counter (OTC) trading is pervasive for most assets. We explain the prevalence of OTC trading using a model of adverse selection, in which informed and uninformed investors choose to trade over-the-counter or on an exchange. OTC dealers' ability to price discriminate allows them to imperfectly cream-skim the uninformed investors from the exchange. Assets with a higher share of trades executed on exchanges are predicted to have wider bid-ask spreads on those exchanges, as supported by evidence from US stocks. Having an OTC market can reduce welfare while increasing total trade volume and decreasing average bid-ask spread. Specifically, for assets that are mostly traded over-the-counter (such as swaps and bonds), having the OTC market actually harms welfare. Our results justify recent policies that seek to end OTC trading in such assets.
    Original languageEnglish
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 7 Jun 2018

    Keywords

    • Over-the-counter
    • exchanges
    • venue choice
    • price discrimination
    • adverse selection

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Why Trade Over-the-Counter? When Investors Want Price Discrimination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this