Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Who’s asking? Interviewer effects on unit nonresponse in the Household Finance and Consumption Survey

  • Nicolas Albacete
  • , Pirmin Fessler
  • , Peter Lindner
  • Oesterreichische Nationalbank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This study examines interviewer effects on household nonresponse in three waves of the Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS) in Austria using a multilevel model. Addressing nonresponse at its source is crucial for maintaining survey data quality and representativeness. Our findings indicate that the variation in response behavior explained by interviewer effects decreased from about one-third in the first wave to 7% in the third wave. Effective interviewers tend to have a university degree, be married, homeowners, and have a larger workload. Additionally, higher mean wages in the household’s municipality negatively affect survey partici-pation. These insights suggest targeted interviewer selection and training strategies to improve response rates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)629-646
Number of pages18
JournalSurvey Methodology
Volume51
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • HFCS
  • Interviewer effects
  • Interviewer survey
  • Unit nonresponse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who’s asking? Interviewer effects on unit nonresponse in the Household Finance and Consumption Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this