Who gains from apparentments under D'Hondt?

Daniel Bochsler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Apparentments - or coalitions of several electoral lists - are a widely neglected aspect of the study of proportional electoral systems. This paper proposes a formal model that explains the benefits political parties derive from apparentments, based on their alliance strategies and relative size. In doing so, it reveals that apparentments are most beneficial for highly fractionalised political blocs. However, it also emerges that large parties stand to gain much more from apparentments than small parties do. Because of this, small parties are likely to join in apparentments with other small parties, excluding large parties where possible. These arguments are tested empirically, using a new dataset from the Swiss national parliamentary elections covering a period from 1995 to 2007.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)617-627
Number of pages11
JournalElectoral Studies
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • Apparentments
  • D'Hondt
  • Electoral systems
  • Mechanical effect
  • PR

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who gains from apparentments under D'Hondt?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this