Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When and how children use explanations to guide generalizations

  • Ny Vasil*
  • , Azzurra Ruggeri
  • , Tania Lombrozo
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • California State University East Bay
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Princeton University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Explanations highlight inductively rich relationships that support further generalizations: if a knife is sharp because it is for cutting, we can infer that other things for cutting might also be sharp. Do children see explanations as good guides to generalization? We asked 108 4- to 7-year-old children to evaluate mechanistic, functional, and categorical explanations of object properties, and to generalize those properties to novel objects on the basis of shared mechanisms, functions, or category membership. Children were significantly more likely to generalize when the explanation they had received matched the subsequent basis for generalization (e.g., generalizing on the basis of a shared mechanism after hearing a mechanistic explanation). This effect appeared to be driven by older children. Explanation-to-generalization coordination also appeared to vary across relationships, mirroring the development of corresponding explanatory preferences. These findings fill an important gap in our understanding of how explanations guide young children's generalization and learning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101144
JournalCognitive Development
Volume61
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Categorical
  • Explanation
  • Functional
  • Generalization
  • Inference
  • Mechanistic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When and how children use explanations to guide generalizations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this