War veterans, demobilization and political activism: Greater Romania in comparison

Constantin Iordachi, Blasco Sciarrino

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

    Abstract (may include machine translation)

    This article aims to further problematize the relationship between patterns of demobilization, fascism and veterans' activism, on several inter-related counts. We argue that the relationship between fascism and war veterans was not a fixed nexus, but the outcome of a complex political constellation of socio-economic and political factors that necessitates a case-by-case in-depth discussion. Also, we argue that these factors were both national and transnational in nature. Finally, we contend that researchers need to employ a synchronic as well as a diachronic perspective, thus accounting for various stages and forms of mobilization of war veterans over time. To substantiate these claims, the current article focuses on a relevant but largely neglected case study: the demobilization of soldiers and war veterans' political activism in interwar Romania. It is argued that, contrary to assumptions in historiography, demobilization in Romania was initially successful. Veterans' mobilization to fascism intensified only in mid-to late 1930s, stimulated by the Great Depression, leading to a growing ideological polarization and the political ascension of the fascist Legion of 'Archangel Michael'. To better grasp the specificities of this case study, the concluding section of the article compares it to patterns of veterans' activism in postwar Italy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)75-117
    Number of pages43
    JournalFascism
    Volume6
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2017

    Keywords

    • Demobilization
    • Fascism
    • First World War
    • Iron Guard
    • Italy
    • Radicalization
    • Romania
    • War veterans

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'War veterans, demobilization and political activism: Greater Romania in comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this