Viejos y nuevos relatos sobre las revoluciones de 1917

Julián Casanova

Viejos y nuevos relatos sobre las revoluciones de 1917

Translated title of the contribution: Old and new approaches on the revolutions of 1917

Julián Casanova^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Political Science

University of Zaragoza

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review Article › peer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The historiography of the Russian Revolution had, since 1917, different "schools of thought", but the fall of Communism in the former uSSR in 1991 has drastically changed the interpretative landscape, with new themes and approaches. this article examines the mutual points of dispute and agreement amongst historians and it seeks to identify the trends that have exercised the main specialists in twentieth-Century Russia in the last three decades.

Translated title of the contribution	Old and new approaches on the revolutions of 1917
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	87-103
Number of pages	17
Journal	Historia Social
Issue number	88
State	Published - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

Historiography
Political violence
Russian revolution
Social and cultural history

Access to Document

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44509485

Cite this

@article{a9819b76b8a544c1beb714737187bf5f,

title = "Viejos y nuevos relatos sobre las revoluciones de 1917",

abstract = "The historiography of the Russian Revolution had, since 1917, different {"}schools of thought{"}, but the fall of Communism in the former uSSR in 1991 has drastically changed the interpretative landscape, with new themes and approaches. this article examines the mutual points of dispute and agreement amongst historians and it seeks to identify the trends that have exercised the main specialists in twentieth-Century Russia in the last three decades.",

keywords = "Historiography, Political violence, Russian revolution, Social and cultural history",

author = "Juli{\'a}n Casanova",

year = "2017",

language = "Spanish",

pages = "87--103",

journal = "Historia Social",

issn = "0214-2570",

publisher = "Fundacion Instituto de Historia Social",

number = "88",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Viejos y nuevos relatos sobre las revoluciones de 1917

AU - Casanova, Julián

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The historiography of the Russian Revolution had, since 1917, different "schools of thought", but the fall of Communism in the former uSSR in 1991 has drastically changed the interpretative landscape, with new themes and approaches. this article examines the mutual points of dispute and agreement amongst historians and it seeks to identify the trends that have exercised the main specialists in twentieth-Century Russia in the last three decades.

AB - The historiography of the Russian Revolution had, since 1917, different "schools of thought", but the fall of Communism in the former uSSR in 1991 has drastically changed the interpretative landscape, with new themes and approaches. this article examines the mutual points of dispute and agreement amongst historians and it seeks to identify the trends that have exercised the main specialists in twentieth-Century Russia in the last three decades.

KW - Historiography

KW - Political violence

KW - Russian revolution

KW - Social and cultural history

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020122296

M3 - Review Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020122296

SN - 0214-2570

SP - 87

EP - 103

JO - Historia Social

JF - Historia Social

IS - 88

ER -

Viejos y nuevos relatos sobre las revoluciones de 1917

Abstract (may include machine translation)

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this