Vagueness and Family Resemblance

Hanoch Ben-Yami*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

In his later writings, Wittgenstein developed, defended, and used alternative modes of explanation, similar to those Meno and other interlocutors of Socrates provide in the Platonic dialogues. The legitimacy of the pre-Socratic form of concept explanation in philosophy is demonstrated by the use Wittgenstein himself makes of it while introducing new terms in the course of his investigations. Wittgenstein's neologisms are among the philosophical terms introduced during the twentieth century that have had the widest use, in philosophy as well as in other disciplines. Wittgenstein's treatment of vagueness, although illuminating in several respects, might disappoint some contemporary philosophers interested in the subject. A family-resemblance concept has to be explained by means of examples or instances. Some instances of a family-resemblance concept might be more typical, in some sense of typicality, than others, but so might be instances of other kinds of concept.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationA Companion to Wittgenstein
EditorsHans-Johann Glock, John Hyman
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Pages407-419
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781118884607
ISBN (Print)9781118641163
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Vagueness and Family Resemblance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this