Understanding the transition from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhytmia, characterized by the chaotic motion of electrical wavefronts in the atria. In clinical practice, AF is classified under two primary categories: paroxysmal AF, short intermittent episodes separated by periods of normal electrical activity; and persistent AF, longer uninterrupted episodes of chaotic electrical activity. However, the precise reasons why AF in a given patient is paroxysmal or persistent is poorly understood. Recently, we have introduced the percolation-based Christensen-Manani-Peters (CMP) model of AF which naturally exhibits both paroxysmal and persistent AF, but precisely how these differences emerge in the model is unclear. In this paper, we dissect the CMP model to identify the cause of these different AF classifications. Starting from a mean-field model where we describe AF as a simple birth-death process, we add layers of complexity to the model and show that persistent AF arises from reentrant circuits which exhibit an asymmetry in their probability of activation relative to deactivation. As a result, different simulations generated at identical model parameters can exhibit fibrillatory episodes spanning several orders of magnitude from a few seconds to months. These findings demonstrate that diverse, complex fibrillatory dynamics can emerge from very simple dynamics in models of AF.