Abstract (may include machine translation)
This article addresses the methodological issues involved in the study of interlingual translation as an avenue of reception in the history of ideas. In particular, it assesses the possible uses of linguistic contextualism and conceptual history (Begrijffsgeschichte) in this endeavor. It argues that both of these approaches have been, or are capable of being, far more sensitive towards the phenomenon of reception than it is usually acknowledged and, indeed, this is an area where cross-fertilization between them (often commended in general but rarely if ever in specific terms) is a practical possibility. Perspectives from Rezeptionsgeschichte may provide useful tools for build-ing bridges between them. A few case studies in translation history are then critically examined, and on the basis of the foregoing methodological reflections propositions are made for further refining the approach taken in those case studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 171-199 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | East Central Europe |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Sep 2009 |
Keywords
- Early-modern period
- Koselleck
- Pocock
- Reception
- Rezeptionsge-schichte
- Skinner
- Translation studies