Abstract (may include machine translation)
This article evaluates how territorial autonomy affects ethnic mobilization and conflict during regime transitions. Previous research has highlighted its conflict-inducing role during prominent transition contexts. Alternatively, it has shown its pacifying role in the “average” case, without distinguishing transition periods from stable contexts. Addressing these gaps, we argue that the de-escalatory consequences of autonomy depend on critical stabilizing factors which are themselves “muted” during transitions. We test our expectations in a cross-national analysis, covering all regime transitions between 1946 and 2017. We also revisit the 1989 transition from Communism, focusing on the role of “inherited” autonomy in the post-communist successor states. This enables us to address concerns whereby autonomy is offered to ward off transitions or whereby transitions are themselves induced by mobilization. Our findings indicate that during transitions, territorial autonomy increases the likelihood of ethnic mobilization, government concessions in response, and violent escalation where these are not forthcoming.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1996-2029 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | Comparative Political Studies |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 13 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Apr 2023 |
Keywords
- civil war
- democratization and regime change
- ethnic conflict
- ethnicity and politics
- federalism
- race
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Wrong Place at the Wrong Time? Territorial Autonomy and Conflict During Regime Transitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
The Wrong Place at the Wrong Time? Territorial Autonomy and Conflict During Regime Transitions
Juon, A. (Contributor), Bochsler, D. (Creator) & Juon, A. (Contributor), Harvard Dataverse, 2023
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/emrol1, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/EMROL1
Dataset