The Violent Implications of Opposition to the Istanbul Convention

Conny Roggeband*, Andrea Krizsán

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This paper focuses on campaigns against the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention). These campaigns not only obstructed ratification processes in a number of countries, but also that the openly hostile and highly gendered attacks had a direct impact on women’s rights activists and their work, seriously hindering their work, but also affecting their well-being and safety. In this paper we explore the violent implications of the campaigns against the Istanbul Convention which are part of wider anti-gender campaigns. We argue that the violence of the campaigns and the violent implications should be considered gendered political violence, which effectively marginalizes women and other targeted groups and obstructs their participation in society and politics and as such is central to current autocratization tendencies and undermining of democracy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number92
JournalSocieties
Volume14
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • Istanbul Convention
  • autocratization
  • democracy
  • gender-based violence
  • women’s rights organisations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Violent Implications of Opposition to the Istanbul Convention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this