The Shifting Canon of Constitutional Equality

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Equality as an ideal, a principle, a value, and a right permeates the canons of contemporary constitutionalism. The recognition of individuals as persons of equal worth and liberty (moral equality) is the working premise of a liberal constitutional democracy. At the same time, the constitutional mandate to advance or promote the conditions of a particular disadvantaged social group (or individuals belonging to it) violates the principle of equal treatment. The constitutional canon on equality has long been shaped by such inherent tensions. The new global wave of autocratization brought restrictions on the rights of women and sexual and religious minorities, highlighting the continuing relevance of debates that are often older than written constitutions. The chapter traces the shifting canon of constitutional equality across three scenarios that provide comparative insights into the canon and the counter-canon of equality and non-discrimination jurisprudence. The cases focus on the constitutional justification of the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’, disability rights, and gender citizenship, also introducing the challenge of intersectionality and affirmative action.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal Canons in an Age of Contestation
Subtitle of host publicationDebating Foundational Texts of Constitutional Democracy and Human Rights
EditorsSujit Choudhry, Michaela Hailbronner, Mattias Kumm
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages362-381
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780191956942
ISBN (Print)9780192866158
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 May 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Shifting Canon of Constitutional Equality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this