Abstract (may include machine translation)
It is a common problem in psychology subject pools for past study participants to inform future participants of key experimental details (also known as crosstalk). Previous research (Edlund, Sagarin, Skowronski, Johnson, & Kutter, 2009) demonstrated that a combined classroom and laboratory treatment could significantly reduce crosstalk. The present investigation tested a laboratory-only treatment for the prevention of crosstalk at five universities, along with institutional-level moderators of crosstalk. Results indicated the presence of crosstalk at all universities and that the laboratory-based treatment was effective in reducing crosstalk. Importantly, crosstalk rates were higher (but successfully neutralized) in research pools with higher research credit requirements. Therefore, this research provides valuable guidance regarding crosstalk prevalence and its minimization by researchers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 181-185 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 154 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 4 May 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Crosstalk
- data integrity
- participant pools
- research methods
- social influence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The prevalence and prevention of crosstalk: A multi-institutional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver