Abstract (may include machine translation)
In philosophical logic and metaphysics there is a long-standing debate around the most appropriate structures to represent indeterministic scenarios concerning the future. We reconstruct here such a debate in a computational setting, focusing on the fundamental difference between moment-based and history-based structures. Our presentation is centered around two versions of an indeterministic scenario in which a programmer wants a machine to perform a given task at some point after a specified time. One of the two versions includes an assumption about the future behaviour of the machine that cannot be encoded in any programming instruction; such version has models over history-based structures but no model over a moment-based structure. Therefore, our work adds a new stance to the debate: moment-based structures can be said to rule out certain indeterministic scenarios that are computationally unfeasible.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 59-74 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Minds and Machines |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Machine scenario
- Open future
- Representations of indeterminism
- Thought experiments