Abstract (may include machine translation)
This chapter focuses on the link between the rule of law and migration in the poisonous context of democratic decay and rule of law backsliding in the EU. The analysis draws on the Hungarian case study, where overall institutional changes introduced since 2010 have led to the establishment of a regime described as ‘illiberal’ and as ‘authoritarian’. The chapter argues that Hungarian asylum policy is essentially designed with one key goal in mind: to deprive people of the right to seek asylum in breach of the international obligations of Hungary and of EU law. This is a direct result of a broader process of rule of law backsliding. The Hungarian case study proves that unresolved issues of rule of law backsliding in some EU Member States affects both the practical implementation of EU basic values (e.g., solidarity) and the proper functioning of EU policies (e.g., asylum policy). The chapter’s conclusion is that the rule of law is not secured sufficiently, either in the EU or by the EU, causing all concerned to lose face.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Migrants’ Rights, Populism and Legal Resilience in Europe |
| Editors | Vladislava Stoyanova, Stijn Smet |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 187-208 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781009040396 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781316510711 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2022 |
Keywords
- European Union
- Hungary
- asylum
- crisis
- democracy
- migration
- rule of law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Loss of Face for Everyone Concerned: EU Rule of Law in the Context of the ‘Migration Crisis’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver