The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and Post-Genocide Justice 25 Years on

Patryk I. Labuda*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

2019 marked the 25th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide and of the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). After prosecuting 73 people, including high-ranking politicians and military leaders, the Rwanda Tribunal closed its doors in 2015. Together with its sister tribunal, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the ICTR is considered one of the first-generation ad hoc tribunals mandated to bring justice to countries emerging from conflict. This review essay examines four books to take stock of the scholarly debate on the ICTR's performance. After analysing the Tribunal's achievements and shortcomings, it explains that scholarly assessments of the ICTR rely on two different analytical lenses - a national and/or international perspective - to make claims about the roles of international criminal tribunals. The essay then discusses the ICTR's interactions with other post-genocide justice mechanisms in Rwanda and the compatibility of concurrent judicial responses to mass violence. In conclusion, it suggests that evolving interpretations of the ICTR's performance reflect prevailing ideas about the goals and limitations of international criminal tribunals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1113-1131
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Journal of International Law
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and Post-Genocide Justice 25 Years on'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this