The Hungarian Semi-Loyal Parties and their Impact on Democratic Consolidation

András Bozóki, Borbála Kriza

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The existence of various semi-loyal or anti-system parties on the fringes of the political party system is a relatively minor but nonetheless frequently debated issue in the literature concerning democratic consolidation. In almost all democracies one may find parties that transgress the constitutionally established boundaries of democratic consensus or at least test the tolerance of democracy. However, such political groups are the most problematic in countries where only a comparatively short time has elapsed after the transition from dictatorship. Democratic practices have not yet become entrenched in the political culture in these countries to the degree necessary for rendering society immune to the types of challenges such groups represent. In Spain it took over a decade for the post-Franco Right to become "domesticated," i.e., to accept democracy in both theory and everyday practice and to relinquish attempts to reinstate the previous regime. In France and Italy an even longer period was necessary for the communist parties to fundamentally rethink their former revolutionary identity and find their places in a pluralist democracy.
The present discussion examines some important consequences of the fact that such parties exist in Hungary today.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPolitical transformation and changing identities in Central and Eastern Europe
EditorsAndrew Blasko, Diana Janušauskienė
Place of PublicationWashington DC
PublisherCouncil for Research in Values and Philosophy
Pages215-242
Number of pages28
ISBN (Print)9781565182462
StatePublished - 2008

Publication series

NameCultural heritage and contemporary change: Series IVA: Eastern and Central Europe
Volume36

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Hungarian Semi-Loyal Parties and their Impact on Democratic Consolidation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this