The enlightened narrative in the age of liberal reform: William Robertson’s view of the progress of society in Hungary

László Kontler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This article examines a translation of the Scottish historian William Robertson’s probably most famous text (based on a previous German edition) in the journal of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in the 1830s, as a case study on continuity between the Enlightenment and the era of liberal reform in Central Europe. It underlines the benefits of the comparative study of Scotland in Robertson’s time and Hungary in the Reform Age as partners in composite polities at the opposite ends of Europe, where patriotic projects of overcoming limitations of political sovereignty via cultural and economic improvement were pursued. The belated reception of Robertson in Hungary took place within a larger initiative of progress and refinement, associated with the liberal Count István Széchenyi, in an environment where many potential sympathizers with his programme were ambivalent about the values of cosmopolitanism and commerce promoted by Robertson, indebted as they remained to more archaic modes of patriotism. In view of the peculiarities of translation, and selection the Hungarian rendering of the View of the Progress was attuned to the sentiments of this constituency, and may be interpreted as a set of discursive gestures aimed at conquering it for the cause of ‘liberalism as refinement.’.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)745-761
Number of pages17
JournalHistory of European Ideas
Volume43
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Oct 2017

Keywords

  • Enlightenment history
  • Hungarian liberalism
  • István széchenyi
  • Translation and reception
  • William robertson

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The enlightened narrative in the age of liberal reform: William Robertson’s view of the progress of society in Hungary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this