TY - JOUR
T1 - The effectiveness of eu law
T2 - Insights from the eu legal framework on asset confiscation
AU - Fazekas, Mihaly
AU - Nanopoulos, Eva
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Based on an institutional and legal mapping of the field across Europe, this article explores the different barriers to the effectiveness of the eu's regime on the recovery and confiscation of proceeds of crime. The aim is to provide a better understanding of the challenges that arise in this field and suggest possible areas of legal or policy intervention. But it is also - using the example of asset confiscation - to contribute to debates about the effectiveness of the eu's legal strategy in building a genuine area of freedom, security and justice. The article argues that, despite the adoption of new legislation in this field and the stronger institutional framework introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, the effectiveness of the eu's action is unlikely to significantly improve. The legal rules still present a number of deficiencies and the emphasis on formal legal solutions has come at the expense of broader questions of transposition and utilisation, which are however crucial to ensuring effective recovery.
AB - Based on an institutional and legal mapping of the field across Europe, this article explores the different barriers to the effectiveness of the eu's regime on the recovery and confiscation of proceeds of crime. The aim is to provide a better understanding of the challenges that arise in this field and suggest possible areas of legal or policy intervention. But it is also - using the example of asset confiscation - to contribute to debates about the effectiveness of the eu's legal strategy in building a genuine area of freedom, security and justice. The article argues that, despite the adoption of new legislation in this field and the stronger institutional framework introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, the effectiveness of the eu's action is unlikely to significantly improve. The legal rules still present a number of deficiencies and the emphasis on formal legal solutions has come at the expense of broader questions of transposition and utilisation, which are however crucial to ensuring effective recovery.
KW - asset confiscation
KW - effectiveness
KW - eu
KW - legal and institutional barriers
KW - utilisation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971254459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/15718174-24012083
DO - 10.1163/15718174-24012083
M3 - Review Article
AN - SCOPUS:84971254459
SN - 0928-9569
VL - 24
SP - 39
EP - 64
JO - European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
JF - European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
IS - 1
ER -