The Effect of Distributive Politics on Electoral Participation: Evidence from 70 Million Agricultural Payments

Gabor Simonovits, Neil Malhotra*, Raymond Ye Lee, Andrew Healy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Policy feedbacks take place when public policies change mass participation and mobilize key constituencies. This can influence future rounds of policymaking and solidify government programs. We explore policy feedback in the context of a particularistic policy targeted to a specific electoral constituency: agricultural producers receiving payments from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). We exploit a novel dataset of: (1) payments distributed to producers by the USDA; and (2) participation in elections for the Farm Service Agency county committees that help administer these payments. The data are novel in that we rely on individual-level administrative histories of actual payments made by the USDA as well as documented forms of participation such as voting in elections and running for office. We find that receiving agricultural payments is associated with a 20% increase in the probability of voting in county elections, a 34% increase in the probability of running for office, and a 25% increase in the probability of winning office.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)737-750
Number of pages14
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Agricultural policy
  • Panel data
  • Participation
  • Policy feedback

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Distributive Politics on Electoral Participation: Evidence from 70 Million Agricultural Payments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this