The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem

Michael Öllinger, Gary Jones, Günther Knoblich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The nine-dot problem is often used to demonstrate and explain mental impasse, creativity, and out of the box thinking. The present study investigated the interplay of a restricted initial search space, the likelihood of invoking a representational change, and the subsequent constraining of an unrestricted search space. In three experimental conditions, participants worked on different versions of the nine-dot problem that hinted at removing particular sources of difficulty from the standard problem. The hints were incremental such that the first suggested a possible route for a solution attempt; the second additionally indicated the dot at which lines meet on the solution path; and the final condition also provided non-dot locations that appear in the solution path. The results showed that in the experimental conditions, representational change is encountered more quickly and problems are solved more often than for the control group. We propose a cognitive model that focuses on general problem-solving heuristics and representational change to explain problem difficulty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-275
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Research
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this