Abstract (may include machine translation)
The article reflects on Peter Mair's work in addressing the claims of the decline of party thesis. The cartel party model is discussed, the relationship between parties and the state, the collusion of parties, the quality of representation provided by them, their organizational responses to environmental change, and their patterns of competition. Critical assessment of the theoretical arguments and a review of the relevant empirical evidence indicate that parties possess more autonomy and influence than suggested by the decline of party thesis and its attendant components, such as the dealignment model. Some of the commonly cited symptoms of party decline are corroborated, but the article highlights the adaptive organizational and social strategies of parties. These strategies, together with the success of parties in maintaining an essentially bipolar pattern of competition, contribute to the resilience of party politics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 194-204 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Party Politics |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- dealignment
- democratization
- party decline and adaptation
- party government
- party system
- representative democracy