The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995

Rita Bajarunieni; John Curtice; Juan Diez Nicolas; Oscar Hernandez; Soren Holmberg; Hans-Dieter Klingemann; Marta Lagos; Filipe B Miranda; Yoshitaka Nishizawa; Steven J Rosenstone; Jacques Thomassen; Gábor Tóka; Gary Cox; Ekkehard Mochmann; Richald Rockwell; Herman Schmitt; Phillips W.  Shively

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995

Rita Bajarunieni, John Curtice, Juan Diez Nicolas, Oscar Hernandez, Soren Holmberg, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Marta Lagos, Filipe B Miranda, Yoshitaka Nishizawa, Steven J Rosenstone, Jacques Thomassen, Gábor Tóka, Gary Cox, Ekkehard Mochmann, Richald Rockwell, Herman Schmitt, Phillips W. Shively

Blinken OSA Archivum

Research output: Book/Report types › Commissioned report

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national research among election studies conducted in forty-seven consolidated and emerging democracies. The goal of this collaboration is to illuminate how the institutions that govern the conduct of elections constrain the beliefs and behaviors of citizens to condition the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections. By coordinating the collection of electoral data across polities, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems strives to advance the understanding of enduring and fundamental debates about electoral behavior in a way not possible through the secondary analysis of existing data. Social scientists from around the world have collaborated to specify the research agenda, the study design, and the micro-and macro-level data that indigenous teams of researchers will collect within each polity.

Original language	English
Number of pages	27
State	Published - 1995

Access to Document

https://cses.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CSES-_-Reports-and-Papers-_-Preliminary-Recommendations-of-the-Planning-Committee.pdfLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

Bajarunieni, R., Curtice, J., Diez Nicolas, J., Hernandez, O., Holmberg, S., Klingemann, H.-D., Lagos, M., B Miranda, F., Nishizawa, Y., Rosenstone, S. J., Thomassen, J., Tóka, G., Cox, G., Mochmann, E., Rockwell, R., Schmitt, H., & Shively, P. W. (1995). The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995. https://cses.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CSES-_-Reports-and-Papers-_-Preliminary-Recommendations-of-the-Planning-Committee.pdf

@book{36def5791b6d448fb41657633b700344,

title = "The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995",

abstract = "The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national research among election studies conducted in forty-seven consolidated and emerging democracies. The goal of this collaboration is to illuminate how the institutions that govern the conduct of elections constrain the beliefs and behaviors of citizens to condition the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections. By coordinating the collection of electoral data across polities, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems strives to advance the understanding of enduring and fundamental debates about electoral behavior in a way not possible through the secondary analysis of existing data. Social scientists from around the world have collaborated to specify the research agenda, the study design, and the micro-and macro-level data that indigenous teams of researchers will collect within each polity.",

author = "Rita Bajarunieni and John Curtice and {Diez Nicolas}, Juan and Oscar Hernandez and Soren Holmberg and Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Marta Lagos and {B Miranda}, Filipe and Yoshitaka Nishizawa and Rosenstone, {Steven J} and Jacques Thomassen and G{\'a}bor T{\'o}ka and Gary Cox and Ekkehard Mochmann and Richald Rockwell and Herman Schmitt and Shively, {Phillips W.}",

year = "1995",

language = "English",

}

Bajarunieni, R, Curtice, J, Diez Nicolas, J, Hernandez, O, Holmberg, S, Klingemann, H-D, Lagos, M, B Miranda, F, Nishizawa, Y, Rosenstone, SJ, Thomassen, J, Tóka, G, Cox, G, Mochmann, E, Rockwell, R, Schmitt, H & Shively, PW 1995, The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995. <https://cses.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CSES-_-Reports-and-Papers-_-Preliminary-Recommendations-of-the-Planning-Committee.pdf>

TY - BOOK

T1 - The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995

AU - Bajarunieni, Rita

AU - Curtice, John

AU - Diez Nicolas, Juan

AU - Hernandez, Oscar

AU - Holmberg, Soren

AU - Klingemann, Hans-Dieter

AU - Lagos, Marta

AU - B Miranda, Filipe

AU - Nishizawa, Yoshitaka

AU - Rosenstone, Steven J

AU - Thomassen, Jacques

AU - Tóka, Gábor

AU - Cox, Gary

AU - Mochmann, Ekkehard

AU - Rockwell, Richald

AU - Schmitt, Herman

AU - Shively, Phillips W.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national research among election studies conducted in forty-seven consolidated and emerging democracies. The goal of this collaboration is to illuminate how the institutions that govern the conduct of elections constrain the beliefs and behaviors of citizens to condition the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections. By coordinating the collection of electoral data across polities, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems strives to advance the understanding of enduring and fundamental debates about electoral behavior in a way not possible through the secondary analysis of existing data. Social scientists from around the world have collaborated to specify the research agenda, the study design, and the micro-and macro-level data that indigenous teams of researchers will collect within each polity.

AB - The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national research among election studies conducted in forty-seven consolidated and emerging democracies. The goal of this collaboration is to illuminate how the institutions that govern the conduct of elections constrain the beliefs and behaviors of citizens to condition the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections. By coordinating the collection of electoral data across polities, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems strives to advance the understanding of enduring and fundamental debates about electoral behavior in a way not possible through the secondary analysis of existing data. Social scientists from around the world have collaborated to specify the research agenda, the study design, and the micro-and macro-level data that indigenous teams of researchers will collect within each polity.

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995

ER -

The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Preliminary Recommendations of the Planning Committee March 10, 1995

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this