Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences

Lauri Kovanen*, Kimmo Kaski, János Kertész, Jari Saramäki

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Recent studies on electronic communication records have shown that human communication has complex temporal structure. We study how communication patterns that involve multiple individuals are affected by attributes such as sex and age. To this end, we represent the communication records as a colored temporal network where node color is used to represent individuals' attributes, and identify patterns known as temporal motifs. We then construct a null model for the occurrence of temporal motifs that takes into account the interaction frequencies and connectivity between nodes of different colors. This null model allows us to detect significant patterns in call sequences that cannot be observed in a static network that uses interaction frequencies as link weights. We find sex-related differences in communication patterns in a large dataset of mobile phone records and show the existence of temporal homophily, the tendency of similar individuals to participate in communication patterns beyond what would be expected on the basis of their average interaction frequencies. We also show that temporal patterns differ between dense and sparse neighborhoods in the network. Because also this result is independent of interaction frequencies, it can be seen as an extension of Granovetter's hypothesis to temporal networks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18070-18075
Number of pages6
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume110
Issue number45
DOIs
StatePublished - 5 Nov 2013

Keywords

  • Human dynamics
  • Social networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this