Abstract (may include machine translation)
Mi azzal a probléma, ha egy olyan portál, mely a hitelességére, pontos tájékoztatására és átláthatósága mellett az emberi jogi elköteleződésére is büszke, interjút jelentet meg a puncs.hu tulajdonosával, és újságírói alákérdezésekkel kvázi hirdetési felületet biztosít neki? Mi azzal a probléma, ha ez a tulajdonos értékeken túli keretben beszélhet üzletéről, hogy fiatal nőket közvetít pénzes férfiaknak? Miért kérdéses újságíró etikai szempontból, ha az interjút készítő nem kérdez vissza és nem szembesíti az interjú alanyt állításainak következményeivel?
What is the problem if a portal that prides itself on its credibility, accuracy and transparency, as well as its commitment to human rights, publishes an interview with the owner of puncs.hu and provides him with a quasi-advertising platform through journalistic sub-questions? What is the problem if this owner can talk about his business in a framework that goes beyond values, that of referring young women to men with money? Why is it questionable journalistic ethics for the interviewer not to ask questions and confront the interviewee with the consequences of his statements?
What is the problem if a portal that prides itself on its credibility, accuracy and transparency, as well as its commitment to human rights, publishes an interview with the owner of puncs.hu and provides him with a quasi-advertising platform through journalistic sub-questions? What is the problem if this owner can talk about his business in a framework that goes beyond values, that of referring young women to men with money? Why is it questionable journalistic ethics for the interviewer not to ask questions and confront the interviewee with the consequences of his statements?
Translated title of the contribution | Sex, love, barbarity. about consumable love |
---|---|
Original language | Hungarian |
Volume | 9 |
No | 13 |
Specialist publication | KETTŐS MÉRCE |
State | Published - 2017 |