Abstract (may include machine translation)
The formula for regime change following the collapse of the Eurasian communist regimes in 1989–1990 seemed clear: to take the step from one-party communist dictatorship with a state monopoly on property to a multi-party parliamentary democracy based on private property ownership and a market economy. However, this idea has failed in several postcommunist countries, producing sui generis regime types without further movement toward the liberal democratic ideal (Zakaria 1997; Carothers 2002; Levitsky and Way 2010).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 113-146 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Social Research |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |