Abstract (may include machine translation)
The formula for regime change following the collapse of the Eurasian communist regimes in 1989–1990 seemed clear: to take the step from one-party communist dictatorship with a state monopoly on property to a multi-party parliamentary democracy based on private property ownership and a market economy. However, this idea has failed in several postcommunist countries, producing sui generis regime types without further movement toward the liberal democratic ideal (Zakaria 1997; Carothers 2002; Levitsky and Way 2010).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 113-146 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | Social Research |
Volume | 86 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2019 |