Abstract (may include machine translation)
This casenote analyzes the UPA decision, where the ECJ missed the opportunity to relax the conditions for standing for judicial review of Community regulatory acts (Regulations). It concludes on the ambiguity of the judgment which, although conservative and usually deferential to the treaty-makers, leaves some window of opportunity for future changes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 60-66 |
| Journal | Nottingham Law Journal |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver