Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets

Carsten Q. Schneider, Claudius Wagemann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract (may include machine translation)

    As a relatively new methodological tool, QCA is still a work in progress. Standards of good practice are needed in order to enhance the quality of its applications. We present a list from A to Z of twenty-six proposals regarding what a "good" QCA-based research entails, both with regard to QCA as a research approach and as an analytical technique. Our suggestions are subdivided into three categories: criteria referring to the research stages before, during, and after the analytical moment of data analysis. This listing can be read as a guideline for authors, reviewers, and readers of QCA.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)397-418
    Number of pages22
    JournalComparative Sociology
    Volume9
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1 Mar 2010

    Keywords

    • Comparative methods
    • Data analysis
    • Fuzzy sets
    • Good practice
    • QCA
    • Research approach

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this