Abstract (may include machine translation)
The idea of improving the performance of environmental policies by combining various instruments and approaches in a smart way is attractive. However, from a theoretical perspective, the idea of optimal mixes seems problematic. This chapter starts from the assumption that governance fields (i.e. the multiple institutions, both public and private, that are operating within a given policy arena across multiple levels) can be best described as complex systems, and consequently develops an argument about the usefulness of complexity sciences in studying smart policy mixes. The area of climate change governance after the Paris Agreement serves as our empirical illustration.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Smart Mixes for Transboundary Environmental Harm |
| Editors | Judith van Erp, Michael Faure, André Nollkaemper, Niels Philipsen |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 49-68 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108653183 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781108428385, 9781108449526 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Smart mixes and the challenge of complexity: Lessons from global climate governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver