Puppets as symbols in early development: From whether to how in the Theory of Puppets debate

Barbu Revencu, Gergely Csibra

Research output: Working paper/PreprintPreprint

Abstract (may include machine translation)

The use of animations and puppet shows in developmental research has recently been questioned on external validity grounds. Do infants and children interpret symbolic stimuli (e.g., animated shapes, wooden circles) as required for a given measure of interest (e.g., as agents)? We review the arguments on both sides and conclude that external validity is not under threat by the mere use of symbolic stimuli. At the same time, the debate in its current formulation runs the risk of masking an important theoretical question: how do infants, children, and adults interpret such stimuli? We present the standard answer to the how-question (symbolic stimuli satisfy the input conditions of the cognitive domain under investigation) and contrast it with the under-explored possibility that these stimuli are interpreted the same way they have been generated (i.e., as representations).
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPsyArXiv Preprints
Pages1-15
Number of pages15
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Puppets as symbols in early development: From whether to how in the Theory of Puppets debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this