Predicting policy attitudes from general prejudice versus specific intergroup emotions

Catherine A. Cottrell*, David A.R. Richards, Austin Lee Nichols

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

How are people's social policy attitudes related to their affective reactions to the social groups affected by those policies? From a threat-based perspective, specific emotions toward a group-above and beyond general prejudice toward that group-should predict attitudes toward a policy affecting the group. To test this, 128 participants reported their support for four social policies, their general and specific affective reactions to each affected group, and the threats ostensibly posed by that group. Although general prejudice failed to predict each policy attitude after controlling for the specific emotions, specific emotions did indeed significantly predict each policy attitude after controlling for general prejudice. Moreover, these specific emotions tended to mediate predicted relationships between perceived threats and policy attitudes. In all, these results highlight the benefits of assessing specific intergroup emotions as they relate to political arenas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-254
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Intergroup emotions
  • Intergroup threat
  • Policy attitudes
  • Prejudice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting policy attitudes from general prejudice versus specific intergroup emotions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this