Practicing and Patronizing Science in the Republic of Letters: Andreas Dudith's Radiating Curiosity, Vanity, and Skepticism

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract (may include machine translation)

    Visible for months, the Great Comet of 1577 attracted worldwide attention, particularly among the scholars of Europe's Respublica Litteraria, and reflections on it were not limited to the books of scientists like Brahe and Kepler; the Hungarian humanist bishop, politician, and nonprofessional astronomer Andreas Dudith (1533-1589) also published a Short Commentary, a fascinating example of the epistemological changes in scientific discourse and astronomical method that characterized the era. With his zealous advocacy of rational argumentation, insistence on the primacy of 'the most direct causes', and caustic criticism of superstition, Dudith was in a complex discussion with the Aristotelian tradition and the theological-astrological explanations of his day, thus helping clear the way for modern scientific thought. As his voluminous correspondence makes clear, he spent the final decades of his life trying to make a professional astronomer of himself, and though his friends in the Respublica helped guide his research, he never mastered the requisite mathematical methods, though remained a patron of science.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)32-75
    Number of pages44
    JournalErudition and the Republic of Letters
    Volume9
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 20 Mar 2024

    Keywords

    • Andreas Dudith
    • anti-Aristotelianism
    • astronomy
    • comet of 1577
    • curiosity
    • patronage
    • Respublica Litteraria
    • skepticism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Practicing and Patronizing Science in the Republic of Letters: Andreas Dudith's Radiating Curiosity, Vanity, and Skepticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this