Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020

Péter Visnovitz*, Erin Kristin Jenne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

There is a general scholarly consensus that populist governments undermine liberal democracy at home, but less agreement over how they behave abroad. While many scholars still subscribe to the view that populism has no consistent impact on foreign policy, we argue that populist leaders engage in a characteristic set of behaviors calculated to elevate the state’s status on the international stage. However, the mechanism by which populist elite-versus people rhetoric translates into concrete foreign policy action remains underspecified. To address this gap, we develop a model showing how populism serves as a political argument to enable status elevation on the international stage. To illustrate this mechanism in action, we analyze the foreign policy rhetoric and behavior of the 2010–2020 Fidesz governments in Hungary, showing how populist argumentation was used to justify revisionist foreign policy through (1) the politicization of diplomatic machinery, (2) confrontation with traditional allies, and (3), the pursuit of more flexible partnerships. In these three respects, we show how populist arguments were used by Orbán to achieve a revolution in Hungarian foreign affairs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)683-702
Number of pages20
JournalComparative European Politics
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Argument analysis
  • Foreign policy
  • Hungary
  • Populism
  • Viktor Orbán

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this