Abstract (may include machine translation)
During 1996–2013 in Hungary, the budget deficit as a share of GDP was on average 3.7 percentage points higher in election years than in the middle of the electoral cycle. In the Czech Republic, Poland and Slovakia, government budgets moved much less with the electoral cycle. About 55% of the increase in the Hungarian deficit came from higher expenditures, while 45% came from lower revenues. The increase in expenditures was concentrated in investments, benefits and transfers,
components which are likely to be visible to voters. These results are consistent with
a moral-hazard based model of political budget cycles and suggest that Hungary’s
political institutions are weaker than those of the other three Visegrad countries.
components which are likely to be visible to voters. These results are consistent with
a moral-hazard based model of political budget cycles and suggest that Hungary’s
political institutions are weaker than those of the other three Visegrad countries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Incentives, Predictions, Volumes, Prices |
Subtitle of host publication | essays commemorating the 20th anniversary of the first graduating class at CEU Economics |
Editors | Gábor Kézdi |
Place of Publication | Budapest |
Publisher | Central European University, Department of Economics |
Pages | 27-38 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Print) | 9789638982230 |
State | Published - 2014 |