Abstract (may include machine translation)
Global programmes (GPs) are crucial actors in transnational policy transfer but understudied in literature. The paper explores GP policy transfer in terms of instruments, space, and time from a comparative perspective. Employing a thematic analysis of policy/programme files and using the GP to prevent gender-biased sex selection as a case study, the paper compares implementation across diverse countries and regions. It finds similar policies and ideas are transferred, across scales, sectors, and actors throughout the policy cycle. Yet short programme cycles contradict longer timeframes needed to assess sex-selection policies and interventions to change social norms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 455-474 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 24 Jul 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- comparative policy analysis
- gender-biased sex selection
- global programmes
- policy transfer
- transnational policy diffusion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Policy Transfer in Global Programmes: A Comparative Analysis of Select Countries in Asia and the Caucasus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver