Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Normativity, equal access to biotechnologies, and anti-perfectionism

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

In this paper I critically assess some arguments made by Elvio Baccarini in his book In a Better World?. I suggest some ways in which his arguments can be clarified; more notable in relation to his general framework of public justification. I also suggests that Baccarini is too lenient with parents in two respects: he gives too much leeway to their right to shape their children's ambitions and plans, and he also allows them too much room for improving their chances to get social and economic advantages. Finally, I make smaller remarks in relation to Baccarini's conception of disabilities and the duties to enhance the severely disabled.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-395
Number of pages13
JournalEtica e Politica
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Equality of opportunity
  • Normative political philosophy
  • Parental rights
  • Public reason

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Normativity, equal access to biotechnologies, and anti-perfectionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this