Nonverbal components of Theory of Mind in typical and atypical development

Dora Kampis*, Dóra Fogd, Ágnes Melinda Kovács

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

To successfully navigate the human social world one needs to realize that behavior is guided by mental states such as goals and beliefs. Humans are highly proficient in using mental states to explain and predict their conspecific's behavior, which enables adjusting one's own behavior in online social interactions. Whereas according to recent studies even young infants seem to integrate others’ beliefs into their own behavior, it is unclear what processes contribute to such competencies and how they may develop. Here we analyze a set of possible nonverbal components of theory of mind that may be involved in taking into account others’ mental states, and discuss findings from typical and atypical development. To track an agent's belief one needs to (i) pay attention to agents that might be potential belief holders, and identify their focus of attention and their potential belief contents; (ii) keep track of their different experiences and their consequent beliefs, and (iii) to make behavioral predictions based on such beliefs. If an individual fails to predict an agent's behavior depending on the agent's beliefs, this may be due to a problem at any stage in the above processes. An analysis of the possible nonverbal processes contributing to belief tracking and their functioning in typical and atypical development aims to provide new insights into the possible mechanisms that make human social interactions uniquely rich.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-62
Number of pages9
JournalInfant Behavior and Development
Volume48
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2017

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Processes of mentalization
  • Social cognition
  • Theory of mind
  • Typical and atypical development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nonverbal components of Theory of Mind in typical and atypical development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this