Neurointerventions, Morality and Children

Matthew Clayton, Andres Moles

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Is the political community morally permitted to use neurointerventions to improve the moral conduct of children? Putting aside difficult questions concerning the institutionalization of moral enhancement, the authors address this question, first, by arguing that is not, in itself, always morally impermissible for the community to impose neurointerventions on adults. Although certain ideals, such as the ideal of individual autonomy, limit the permissible employment of neurointerventions, they do not generate a moral constraint that always forbids their use. Thereafter, they argue that because young children lack certain moral capacities that adults possess, the moral limits that pertain to the use of neurointerventions to improve their moral behaviour are, in principle, less restrictive than they are for adults.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTreatment for Crime
Subtitle of host publicationPhilosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice
EditorsDavid Birks, Thomas Douglas
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages235-251
ISBN (Print)9780198758617
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Publication series

NameEngaging Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neurointerventions, Morality and Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this