Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation

Gergely Csibra*, György Gergely

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

We propose that the cognitive mechanisms that enable the transmission of cultural knowledge by communication between individuals constitute a system of 'natural pedagogy' in humans, and represent an evolutionary adaptation along the hominin lineage. We discuss three kinds of arguments that support this hypothesis. First, natural pedagogy is likely to be human-specific: while social learning and communication are both widespread in non-human animals, we know of no example of social learning by communication in any other species apart from humans. Second, natural pedagogy is universal: despite the huge variability in child-rearing practices, all human cultures rely on communication to transmit to novices a variety of different types of cultural knowledge, including information about artefact kinds, conventional behaviours, arbitrary referential symbols, cognitively opaque skills and know-how embedded in means-end actions. Third, the data available on early hominin technological culture are more compatible with the assumption that natural pedagogy was an independently selected adaptive cognitive system than considering it as a by-product of some other human-specific adaptation, such as language. By providing a qualitatively new type of social learning mechanism, natural pedagogy is not only the product but also one of the sources of the rich cultural heritage of our species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1149-1157
Number of pages9
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume366
Issue number1567
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Apr 2011

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Cultural transmission
  • Evolution
  • Natural pedagogy
  • Social learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this