Abstract (may include machine translation)
In the past five years, 13 counties in Eastern Oregon have voted in nonbinding referendums to separate from the liberal state of Oregon to join the conservative state of Idaho. Drawing on theories of secessionism and irredentism, this article examines the drivers of the so-called Greater Idaho movement by administering a survey in these separatist counties. Our findings indicate that economic discontent and a strong regional identity are more important than fears or partisanship in determining support for moving the interstate border. Our study suggests that more inclusive governance may help to overcome ideological polarization in this case and offers insights into how political divisions may be managed to prevent separatist violence in the United States more generally. We conclude that political minorities need to believe that they have a voice in the system so that they do not mobilize for exit.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 622-629 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | PS: Political Science & Politics |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"My Own Private Idaho": A Survey of Separatist Attitudes in the Pacific Northwest'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Replication Data for: “My Own Private Idaho”: A Survey of Separatist Attitudes in the Pacific Northwest
Dzebo, S. (Contributor), Jenne, E. K. (Creator), Littvay, L. (Creator) & Dzebo, S. (Contributor), Harvard Dataverse, 13 Feb 2025
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/lh6zin, https://dataverse.harvard.edu/citation?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/LH6ZIN
Dataset
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver