Misperception and ethnic conflict: Transylvania's societal security dilemma

Research output: Contribution to journalReview Articlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This article proposes that instances of ethnic violence can profitably be viewed through the concept of a societal security dilemma. It begins by arguing that the explanatory value of the security dilemma might be enhanced by shifting the focus of the concept away from its traditional concern with state sovereignty to an emphasis on ethnic identity instead. This is proposed through combining the security dilemma with the Copenhagen School's notion of societal security. In this way, the article claims that the resultant societal security dilemma is able to capture certain dynamics between ethnic groups that its traditional variant necessarily misses. The article then goes on to show how ethnic violence between Hungarians and Romanians in the Transylvanian city of Tirgu Mures can be partly explained by the societal security dilemma concept. It argues that many Romanians were mobilized on the basis of the misperception that Hungarian societal security requirements necessarily threatened their own identity. The article concludes that misperceptions on both sides were enabled by the weakness of the Romanian State; that insufficient mechanisms existed for the clear, unambiguous signalling of intentions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-74
Number of pages18
JournalReview of International Studies
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Misperception and ethnic conflict: Transylvania's societal security dilemma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this