Minority representation in a semi-democratic regime: The Georgian case

Daniel Zollinger, Daniel Bochsler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

This article suggests that in most semi-democracies, the same solution might not be that favourable to minorities. Many semi-democratic countries either restrict party competition or limit parties of ethnic minorities, including: Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kirgistan, Cameron, Equatorial Guinea, Tanzania, Gabon, Kenya, Mauritania, and Congo (Brazzaville). This article highlights the impact of the electoral system and the importance of political plurality and electoral district design in such contexts. The article argues that the interests of minorities are best protected if they can elect their representatives in small, ethnically homogeneous electoral districts. Plurality or majority voting systems offer minorities the possibility to run with independent candidates. The case study in this article elections to municipal councils in Georgia in 2006 under a mixed electoral system seem to reflect the hypothesized pattern.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-641
Number of pages31
JournalDemocratization
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Elections
  • Georgia
  • Minorities
  • Plurality
  • Semi-democracy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minority representation in a semi-democratic regime: The Georgian case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this