Measuring democracy through election outcomes: A critique with African data

Matthijs Bogaards*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Cross-national measures of democracy are widely used to track the development and spread of democracy around the world and to study the causes and correlates of democratization. Most of the best-known democracy indexes have a component on election outcomes. In many measures, election outcomes make a significant contribution to a country's overall rating, and in some, the outcomes are even decisive. However, in the first empirical test of this relationship, using data from 165 African multiparty elections in 26 countries, this article demonstrates that election outcomes are not consistently related to democracy and that the assumptions behind such a relationship are problematic. Therefore, election outcomes are a flawed shortcut to measuring democracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1211-1237
Number of pages27
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Competition
  • Democracy
  • Elections
  • Measurement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring democracy through election outcomes: A critique with African data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this