Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Payne, Burkley, and Stokes (2008), Study 4

Charles R. Ebersole*, Luca Andrighetto, Erica Casini, Carlo Chiorri, Anna Dalla Rosa, Filippo Domaneschi, Ian R. Ferguson, Emily Fryberger, Mauro Giacomantonio, Jon E. Grahe, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Eleanor V. Langford, Austin Lee Nichols, Angelo Panno, Kimberly P. Parks, Emanuele Preti, Juliette Richetin, Michelangelo Vianello

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

To rule out an alternative to their structural-fit hypothesis, Payne, Burkley, and Stokes (2008) demonstrated that correlations between implicit and explicit race attitudes were weaker when participants were put under high pressure to respond without bias than when they were placed under low pressure. This effect was replicated in Italy by Vianello (2015), although the replication effect was smaller than the original effect. In the current investigation, we examined the possibility that the source of a study’s sample moderates this effect. Teams from eight universities, four in the United States and four in Italy, replicated the original study (replication N = 1,103). Although we did detect moderation by the sample’s country, it was due to a reversal of the original effect in the United States and a lack of the original effect in Italy. We discuss this curious finding and possible explanations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-393
Number of pages7
JournalAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • direct replication
  • open data
  • open materials
  • preregistered
  • reproducibility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Payne, Burkley, and Stokes (2008), Study 4'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this