Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Leadership Turnovers and Their Electoral Consequences: A Social Democratic Exceptionalism?

  • University of Texas at Austin
  • Colorado State University

Research output: Contribution to Book/Report typesChapterpeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Pundits have attributed the frequency of party leadership churns as a factor in the decline of the German Social Democrats. But have leadership changes and their frequency contributed to the German SPD's and other social democratic parties' declines across parliamentary systems? More generally, when and why do political parties change their leaders, and what are the electoral consequences of these changes? Using original party leadership data from ten parliamentary democracies across three decades, we show that while factors that affect leader durations in office vary across countries/regions, there are no unique factors influencing social democratic leaders' tenure. In addition, while leadership changes and the frequency of leadership changes have some minor impact on polling results, they do not influence election results, and once again, their effects do not vary across party families. Our results have important implications for the party organizations and electoral outcomes literatures and call into question the recent argument about the increasing presidentialization of politics in parliamentary systems.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBeyond Social Democracy
Subtitle of host publicationThe Transformation of the Left in Emerging Knowledge Societies
EditorsSilja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages366-392
Number of pages27
ISBN (Electronic)9781009496810
ISBN (Print)9781009496827
DOIs
StatePublished - 31 Aug 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • leadership turnover
  • left parties
  • social democratic parties

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leadership Turnovers and Their Electoral Consequences: A Social Democratic Exceptionalism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this