TY - JOUR
T1 - Landfill gas collection efficiency
T2 - Categorization of data from existing in-situ measurements
AU - Giordano, Charles R.
AU - Van Brunt, Michael E.
AU - Halevi, Shanee J.
AU - Castaldi, Marco J.
AU - Orlovits, Zsanett
AU - Illes, Zoltan
N1 - Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Landfill methane emissions are commonly estimated using cover-type dependent default collection efficiency values, with a first-order decay model or measured gas collection. Current default collection efficiencies used in the United States were predominately derived from 4 studies conducted during or prior to 2007 that relied on flux chambers. Flux chambers are limited by small sample sizes, placement restrictions, and the inability to measure emissions from gas or leachate collection systems. Since 2007, over 14 new studies have been completed using more advanced technologies that allow for direct measurement of methane plumes from most or all of a landfill's surface. On average, these measurements are 2–3 times greater than emissions predicted by current models and collection efficiency defaults. In lieu of measuring emissions from all landfills, updating collection efficiency defaults can bring modeled emissions into better alignment with measurements. To this end, collection efficiency estimates derived from measured data were categorized into cover types and then adjusted to account for cases where whole plume measurement was an amalgamation of multiple cover types. The resultant adjusted default values were 41% for daily cover, 69% for intermediate cover, and 71% for final cover. Direct measurement of landfill methane emissions is preferrable to account for the full range of variables driving landfill emissions, including collection system design and operation. However, applying these updated defaults back into the landfill emission models eliminates underprediction of landfill emissions for the dataset reviewed, and would provide a more accurate estimate of landfill gas emissions where measurements are unavailable.
AB - Landfill methane emissions are commonly estimated using cover-type dependent default collection efficiency values, with a first-order decay model or measured gas collection. Current default collection efficiencies used in the United States were predominately derived from 4 studies conducted during or prior to 2007 that relied on flux chambers. Flux chambers are limited by small sample sizes, placement restrictions, and the inability to measure emissions from gas or leachate collection systems. Since 2007, over 14 new studies have been completed using more advanced technologies that allow for direct measurement of methane plumes from most or all of a landfill's surface. On average, these measurements are 2–3 times greater than emissions predicted by current models and collection efficiency defaults. In lieu of measuring emissions from all landfills, updating collection efficiency defaults can bring modeled emissions into better alignment with measurements. To this end, collection efficiency estimates derived from measured data were categorized into cover types and then adjusted to account for cases where whole plume measurement was an amalgamation of multiple cover types. The resultant adjusted default values were 41% for daily cover, 69% for intermediate cover, and 71% for final cover. Direct measurement of landfill methane emissions is preferrable to account for the full range of variables driving landfill emissions, including collection system design and operation. However, applying these updated defaults back into the landfill emission models eliminates underprediction of landfill emissions for the dataset reviewed, and would provide a more accurate estimate of landfill gas emissions where measurements are unavailable.
KW - Air Pollutants/analysis
KW - Environmental Monitoring
KW - Methane/analysis
KW - Refuse Disposal
KW - Waste Disposal Facilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181812880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.12.042
DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.12.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 38176201
AN - SCOPUS:85181812880
SN - 0956-053X
VL - 175
SP - 83
EP - 91
JO - Waste Management
JF - Waste Management
ER -