Is the time ripe for global binding norms for corporate accountability?

Stephen Stec*, Magdalena Paszkiewicz, Alexios Antypas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract (may include machine translation)

Standards for the social and environmental performance of corporations have been a topic at every major international conference on environment and development for several decades. A wide variety of voluntary instruments championed under the label of 'corporate social responsibility' or corporate social responsibility (CSR) have more recently been challenged by communities calling for greater accountability under the label of 'corporate accountability' or CA. This paper examines the dynamics of the CSR/CA debate surrounding the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (the 'Rio + 20 Conference'), in particular the failure of an unusual multi-stakeholder consensus on binding 'report or explain' standards to gain traction, which raises the question: how close are we to international legally binding norms for corporate accountability in the area of sustainability goals, and what shape could such norms take? It concludes with considerations for a potential legally binding instrument on corporate accountability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-148
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development
Volume11
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • CSR
  • Corporate accountability
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Performance standards
  • Report or explain
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainability reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the time ripe for global binding norms for corporate accountability?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this