TY - JOUR
T1 - Introduction
T2 - Cross-confessional diplomacy and diplomatic intermediaries in the early modern Mediterranean
AU - Krstić, Tijana
AU - Van Gelder, Maartje
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2015.
PY - 2015/4/21
Y1 - 2015/4/21
N2 - This special issue, an exercise in integrated Mediterranean history through the lens of diplomacy, demonstrates that diplomatic genres and practices associated with a European political and cultural tradition, on the one hand, or an Islamic tradition, on the other, were not produced in isolation but attained meaning through the process of mediation and negotiation among intermediaries of different confessional and social backgrounds. Building on the "new diplomatic history," the essays focus on non-elite (e.g. Christian slaves, renegades, Jewish doctors, Moriscos) and less commonly studied (mid- and high-ranking Muslim officials) intermediaries in Mediterranean crossconfessional diplomacy. The issue argues that the early modern period witnessed a relative balance of power among Muslim- and Christian-ruled polities: negotiations entailed not only principles of reciprocity, parity, and commensurability, but these were actually enforceable in practice. This challenges the notion of European diplomatic supremacy, prompting scholars to fundamentally rethink the narrative about the origins of early modern diplomacy.
AB - This special issue, an exercise in integrated Mediterranean history through the lens of diplomacy, demonstrates that diplomatic genres and practices associated with a European political and cultural tradition, on the one hand, or an Islamic tradition, on the other, were not produced in isolation but attained meaning through the process of mediation and negotiation among intermediaries of different confessional and social backgrounds. Building on the "new diplomatic history," the essays focus on non-elite (e.g. Christian slaves, renegades, Jewish doctors, Moriscos) and less commonly studied (mid- and high-ranking Muslim officials) intermediaries in Mediterranean crossconfessional diplomacy. The issue argues that the early modern period witnessed a relative balance of power among Muslim- and Christian-ruled polities: negotiations entailed not only principles of reciprocity, parity, and commensurability, but these were actually enforceable in practice. This challenges the notion of European diplomatic supremacy, prompting scholars to fundamentally rethink the narrative about the origins of early modern diplomacy.
KW - Mediterranean
KW - connected histories
KW - cross-confessional relations
KW - diplomacy
KW - intermediaries
KW - new diplomatic history
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930743321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/15700658-12342452
DO - 10.1163/15700658-12342452
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930743321
SN - 1385-3783
VL - 19
SP - 93
EP - 105
JO - Journal of Early Modern History
JF - Journal of Early Modern History
IS - 2-3
ER -